Filtered Reasoning Score: Evaluating Reasoning Quality on a Model's Most-Confident Traces
Accuracy treats every answer the same, but deployed systems act on the outputs a model is most confident about. FRS evaluates reasoning quality on exactly those traces, conditioning the metric on the model's own confidence. The result is a view of reliability that accuracy alone cannot provide: two models with identical scores can behave very differently when you only trust what they are sure of, and FRS makes that difference measurable. Across 9 models and 6 reasoning benchmarks, FRS separates models tied at 63.6% accuracy by 16.5 points, agrees with human raters 78% of the time, and its confidence-conditioned top-K ranking lifts rank correlation from 0.45 to 0.73.